Beyond this, the content of this cover
demonstrates the hidden message of beauty-ideals sent to consumers. As far as
the image of Kim, it really seems to set standards high as of what ‘good
looking’ in society is portrayed as. With no knowledge of how retouched the
photo is, it leaves consumers wondering if such an appearance is even realistically
attainable, especially after pregnancy weight gain! But it fools us into to
thinking it is, therefore putting this universal pressure on females to live up
to such standards as well has setting a bar for males of what beautiful,
successful and desirable women should be able to look like.
Meanwhile, ridiculous subtitles and
picture of a “heavier” Kim rests off to the side in order to show the contrast
in her weight fluctuation. In regards to an article found on the inside of the
magazine, Kim’s pregnancy weight gain and loss is the majority focus of this
issue’s cover. Kim’s image and the untrustworthy claims swamp the mass of the
page. The subtitle of the smaller pregnancy photo reads, “April 2013: Kim at
her heaviest and most miserable”. While bullets at the base of the main image
of Kim exclaim of her “no-starve diet”, “flat-tummy workout trick” and “secret
snack that burns calories fast”. These are apparently tricks of Kim’s after
having been “bullied for her pregnancy weight gain”.
This kind of attention, on weight
gain—especially a pregnant woman’s—is extremely trivial and gives society the
impression that weight gain is something to be ashamed of, especially if a famous face such as Kim Kardashian “cries”
over apparently “fat hands”. Does that
mean the rest of us too should be overly upset if our hands are pudgy? Society
sees these claims, this emphasis on weight—in turn appearance—and may succumb
to the influence that tabloids put on females to live up to the expectation of
beauty.
No comments:
Post a Comment